I had a conversation last week that set me off thinking about death, so I'm going to blog a few thoughts on it. Conversation:
What's scary?Well, not existing.
Why?What do you mean?
What's scary about it?It's just... I don't know, isn't that a really basic biological thing to be scared of? You seriously don't find it scary?
No.Really?
It's never seemed scary. It's just the way it is.Of course it's scary. At least, it's scary when applied to me. I don't like the idea of stopping, of never knowing what will happen in the world, of not learning any new music, never reading another book. I have trouble comprehending it. I don't know how to think about a world in which I don't exist.
One of my favourite profs in bible college once said, "Those who think we die like dogs have never really thought about it." I liked him at the time and still thought that was an incredibly arrogant thing to say. Now that I do think that we die "like dogs" (with no afterlife), it irks me even more. Of course I have thought about it. It's not an unreasonable conclusion to come to.
At my uncle's funeral, I sat with my sister and cousin, both of whom are not Christian, and listened to my former pastor tell us that we are blessed because we do not mourn like those who have no hope. This thought is drawn from 1 Thessalonians 4:13 (NIV): "Brothers*, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to grieve like the rest of men*, who have no hope." This thought, meant to comfort, only served to alienate us from the rest of our family, because we were the ones "with no hope." The comparison bothers me. Why is it so important in a funeral to affirm that Christians do not mourn like those other pitiful people who don't believe as they do? Why the need to explicitly say, "This sucks, but at least we're not like
you"? Is the funeral service not a space for us to mourn too?
That thought is not even really that helpful for Christians.
And poor C. quotes to me, 'Do not mourn like those that have no hope.' It astonishes me, the way we are invited to apply to ourselves words so obviously addressed to our betters. What St. Paul says can comfort only those who love God better than the dead, and the dead better than themselves. If a mother is mourning not for what she has lost but for what her dead child has lost, it is a comfort to believe that the child has not lost the end for which it was created. And it is a comfort to believe that she herself, in losing her chief or only natural happiness, has not lost a greater thing, that she may still hope to 'glorify God and enjoy Him forever.' A comfort to the God-aimed, eternal spirit within her. But not to her motherhood. The specifically maternal happiness must be written off. Never, in any place or time, will she have her son on her knees, or bathe him, or tell him a story, or plan for his future, or see her grandchild. (C.S. Lewis, A Grief Observed)
This is an important point. When my uncle died, I believe that he simply stopped. He is not there anymore, not any part of him, and this way of thinking requires me to actually mourn it. I can't mask it with thoughts that I'll see him again or that he's happy now or that he's better off, because he's not, he's just done. Not only that, he's not in hell. Depression does not affect him anymore.
While I am disturbed at the thought of dying, I don't feel like an afterlife is any more comforting. I don't know what people think lives on. The idea of 'spirit' or 'soul' is really sketchy. I know enough about brain disorders and injuries to know that a lot of what we consider personality is packed into your brain matter. When you have a stroke, that stuff is damaged and your personality can change. What happens when your brain decomposes altogether?
I've heard some people suggest that it's not your personality that lives on, but if it's not your personality, then as far as I'm concerned, it's not you. It makes no sense to me to find comfort in the idea that the part of my uncle that wasn't his body and wasn't his personality lives on. I don't know that part of him. I don't even know what that is. In a practical sense, there's no difference between saying that and saying that he is just dead and there is nothing more to him.
There is another idea, which is that we continue to have some sort of awareness, but no interaction. I think that would be ultimately very depressing. What could be more lonely than to be ever-observing the world but never a part of it?
In the end, I think we do "die like dogs." This thought does not disturb us when applied to flies or squirrels or plants. It only becomes disturbing when applied to humans, because it taps into our fear of death. Ecclesiastes 3:11 says that "He [God] has also set eternity in the hearts of men*," but I'm not sure that it's eternity so much as self-awareness. We are introspective, and since we think of the world with ourselves as the main character, it's disturbing to imagine the world going on without us. We solve this by inventing ways that we can live on. It's the only way our personal narrative makes any sense.
The secret fear is that there is no overarching narrative. We live and die and most of those who have lived are totally forgotten, and that is okay, just like it is okay for cats and badgers and trees. Scary, eh?
*That's right. The bible is written by, to, and about men. But you already know that rant, right?