on atheists and jesus, yet again
Why We Let An Atheist Join Our Church:
Because life is an ineffable mystery, religion speaks in pictures and symbols. To accept or reject the symbols literally is to miss the point from two different sides. Those who fight over whether God exists are like foolish pedestrians who praise or curse a red light as they step into oncoming traffic. The question isn't whether God exists like a brick exists, but rather "what part of our experience does the symbol 'God' reveal and what parts does it obscure?"More and more, I'm starting to think that the liberal religious people are onto something. There's this treatment of God as a symbol and not an actual being (sort of) that I've been completely unfamiliar with, and I'm starting to see how it could be useful.
The problem with most religious discussions is that we are usually swimming in a sea of undefined terms. What sense does it make to ask whether God exists if we don't define what we mean by the term "God." For some it's easier to reconcile themselves to the universe by picturing a large person overseeing the process, while others reconcile themselves to the ground by using impersonal elemental images. These approaches are in conflict only when we forget what we are trying to do in the first place, which is to harmonize with the ground of our being...
As William James pointed out, religion is not merely hypothetical opinion about the world. Religion is most essentially a decision to be engaged in a world that cannot be understood and offers no guarantees. "God" is a symbol of the truth that stands outside our widest context. "God" is a symbol of the reality deeper than our ultimate concern. "God" is a symbol of the mystery that lies between the poles of our clearest rational dichotomy. The point is not to affirm the reality of the symbol itself, but to affirm the reality to which the symbol points.
It's funny, I find myself identifying less and less with the online atheist community. So many of them are so reactionary and so hateful towards religious people. I understand that they're angry, and I understand that most of them don't live in a place as open and varied as Toronto, a place where I can be religious or non-religious without any consequence. I don't envy the bible-belt dwellers! But then I see discussions about how they find it impossible to have respect for theists and I can't believe what I'm reading. I just don't get it. Maybe because I remember how natural it was to believe in God. How could I lose respect for theists without losing respect for myself? It wasn't so long ago that I was one.
I found the Internet Infidels discussion forum to be really helpful when I was first leaving Christianity, but now it seems silly to me. There are so many arguments that I've seen rehashed over and over for years. I don't need to rant about all of that anymore. I'm significantly less angry, and I'm starting to see more variations of Christianity, variations that I would be much more comfortable with than the evangelical sort that I grew up with. I do find it interesting that these variations use practically the same vocabulary, but they use it so differently, and it makes it almost impossible to get a discussion going between the two. So many of the rants I find online are so simplistic, they assume that all Christians are like this, and all atheists are like that, and it just doesn't work that way. There are so many ways of being Christian, and so many ways of being atheist, and even some ways of being both.
I've been thinking about grad school lately, and considering an ethnographic study of evangelical culture. It would be a good project, almost guaranteed to get funding, but every time I think about it, I cringe inside and think, "I'm never going to get away from them, am I? Isn't it time I move on? I would have to go to church!" I was talking a friend last weekend who used to be Christian (like practically all my friends from home, you bunch of heathens!) and who said that he never thinks about it anymore. I don't know how he manages itI think about these things constantly. Sometimes I wish I could just turn it off.


4 Comments:
As a recent deconverter I find internet infidels interesting as far as the information they've provided and the support. On the other hand the Generalizing of Christians is no different than the generalization on atheists from Christians that like to complain about. Besides those are my friends and family they are talking about.
A friend.
Yeah, I find the generalizations from the other side just as bothersome. And I totally see the value of internet infidels, I just find that I don't particularly need it these days.
My recent experience at the Anglican advocacy and justice camp was amazing. And I definatly see how different movements use the same language but with very different outcomes. One bible verse we study was about a king who was obsessed with cedar (the equivilant of money) instead of helping the poor, and God said how it was wrong. I took this to mean that I have to get the temptations out of my personal live and help others. But everyone else interpreted it has how capitalism as lead to this world where people are only worried about consuming and not helping the poor. Very similar, but the outcomes are extremly different. The evangelical view tens to be about personal reform while many of the more 'traditional' traditions seem to (sometimes) have a much wider view.
Ah. You are slowly inching toward graduate school. I thought you might.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home